Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and one about 2 years ago (Right)
http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg

ICK!

Andy

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...

> Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and
> one about 2 years ago (Right)
> http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg
>
> ICK!

I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't
panic.
-j

"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0
:

> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't
> panic.
> -j


Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced.

I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included
haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information.

There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!!

Imho,

Andy

On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:10:47 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:

>"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0
:
>
>> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't
>> panic.
>> -j
>
>
>Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced.
>
>I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included
>haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information.
>
>There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!!

I'm pretty sure that the ingredients are actually the same, but they
have to tell you a bit more about where they came from now, ie.
processed X instead of just X... lard isn't what I'd call a healthy
ingredient at the best of times!

On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:10:47 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:

>"jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0
:
>
>> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't
>> panic.
>> -j
>
>
>Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced.
>
>I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included
>haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information.
>
>There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!!
>
>Imho,
>
>Andy
There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's
just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be
more detailed in some of their definitions.

I will say I don't like the new photo as much as the old photo.
Compared side by side, which muffins would YOU prefer to eat?

Cathy

cathy wrote:

>>Andy
> There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's
> just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be
> more detailed in some of their definitions.

The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so
incomplete!


> I will say I don't like the new photo as much as the old photo.
> Compared side by side, which muffins would YOU prefer to eat?

Are you an advertising executive? I don't do muffins. Cornbread is
loafed, since I was a kid! YMMV.

All the best,

Andy

projectile vomit chick > wrote in
:

> On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:27:01 -0500, in rec.food.cooking, Andy <q>
> stated with some uncertainty:
>>cathy wrote:
>>
>>>>Andy
>>> There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate.
It's
>>> just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to
be
>>> more detailed in some of their definitions.
>>
>>The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so
>>incomplete!
>
> Well then don't eat Jiffy corn bread muffins, dumb****. Make your own
> from scratch if you're so concerned. Sheesh, what some people get
> their knickers all in a twist over....


projectile vomit chick,

You have a point there, but your hair conceals it.

Andy

On Wed 24 May 2006 12:39:31p, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it projectile
vomit chick?

> On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:27:01 -0500, in rec.food.cooking, Andy <q>
> stated with some uncertainty:
>>cathy wrote:
>>
>>>>Andy
>>> There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's
>>> just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be
>>> more detailed in some of their definitions.
>>
>>The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so
>>incomplete!
>
> Well then don't eat Jiffy corn bread muffins, dumb****. Make your own
> from scratch if you're so concerned. Sheesh, what some people get
> their knickers all in a twist over....

Yep, people were making and eating good cornbread long before Jiffy or
anything else in a box.

--

Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________ ___________

"How can a nation be great if it's bread taste like Kleenex?"

Julia Child

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> projectile vomit chick > wrote in
> :
>
> > On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:27:01 -0500, in rec.food.cooking, Andy <q>
> > stated with some uncertainty:
> >>cathy wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Andy
> >>> There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate.
> It's
> >>> just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to
> be
> >>> more detailed in some of their definitions.
> >>
> >>The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so
> >>incomplete!
> >
> > Well then don't eat Jiffy corn bread muffins, dumb****. Make your own
> > from scratch if you're so concerned. Sheesh, what some people get
> > their knickers all in a twist over....
>
>
> projectile vomit chick,
>
> You have a point there, but your hair conceals it.
>
lol



Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php

Andy wrote:
> "jacqui{JB}" > wrote in news:44743e86$0
> :
>
> > I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements. Don't
> > panic.
> > -j
>
>
> Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have surfaced.
>
> I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included
> haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional information.
>
> There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!!
>
> Imho,
>
> Andy

Hey, Jiffy conrbread and Johnny cakes are da bomb! Toss in a little
white sugar and/or bacon - yummity!

Actually, the Jiffy brownie mix is my secret weapon. You make it
according to package, but add a T more water. Layer the mix, and a
handful of chocolate chips in a 4x8 pan, and then top with a few more
chips. Bake until done but not dry/crunchy. People scream in esctasy
when eating these. Heh.
-L.

"projectile vomit chick" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:27:01 -0500, in rec.food.cooking, Andy <q>
> stated with some uncertainty:
>>cathy wrote:
>>
>>>>Andy
>>> There's nothing in the new package that isn't in the old packate. It's
>>> just that FDA packaging labeling has changed a bit and they have to be
>>> more detailed in some of their definitions.
>>
>>The only complaint left is that the nutrition labels are still so
>>incomplete!
>
> Well then don't eat Jiffy corn bread muffins, dumb****. Make your own
> from scratch if you're so concerned. Sheesh, what some people get
> their knickers all in a twist over....

Dear vomit,
I've killfiled you a dozen times, but your address just keeps changing. Is
this because you are on-the-LAMB?
I don't killfile you because you're offensive, but because you are so
predictable and pathetically boring.
Dee Dee

Andy wrote:

> Two boxes, one bought yesterday (Left) and one about 2 years ago (Right)
> http://i4.tinypic.com/10ib3pc.jpg
>
> ICK!
>
> Andy

Oh, interesting! If I had known Jiffy Mix contained lard, I
might have tried it. But not with partially hydrogenated
lard. I wonder, though, whether it always contained that and
just had to relabel for transfat purposes?

--
Jean B.

-L. wrote:
> Andy wrote:
>> "jacqui{JB}" > wrote in
>> news:44743e86$0 :
>>
>>> I think the only thing that's changed is labeling requirements.
>>> Don't panic.
>>> -j
>>
>>
>> Well, nothing has changed perhaps, but unhealthy ingredients have
>> surfaced.
>>
>> I might add, I'm not singling out Jiffy. Other foods, Jiffy included
>> haven't come clean on complete macro and micro nutritional
>> information.
>>
>> There's your processed foods for ya!!! The BUMS!!!
>>
>> Imho,
>>
>> Andy
>
> Hey, Jiffy conrbread and Johnny cakes are da bomb! Toss in a little
> white sugar and/or bacon - yummity!
>
Oh NO! Jiffy cornbread/muffin mix is already entirely too sweet! When I
resort to using it, I add salt to counteract the darned sugar.

Jill