"Dee Dee" > wrote in message
...
>
> "ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Dee Dee wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I doubt that there would have been much more than a sentence in a
>>> history book about HH, maybe in "aviation."; perhaps in a theatre/drama
>>> class book.
>>>
>>> If I had a brain, it would have been "Physics and Chemistry." History
>>> books are always available. More than history being obliterated, the
>>> books will be re-written/changed; after all the ones written now are
>>> generally biased.
>>
>> Didn't someone say that "History is written by the victors"? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574e0/574e0103512ce12043eb96165930f431775c3e18" alt="Wink"
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Chatty Cathy
>>
>
> I think there is more to it than that. History is oft-times written by
> loosers so that the loosers will appear to be the victors so that they can
> sway opinion their way. (IOW, it works both ways IMO.)
>
> Dee Dee
Loosers? Hmmm.
So, are you one of those people who doesn't read history at all because it's
more convenient to find imaginary problems with the books?