View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
modom (palindrome guy)[_2_] modom (palindrome guy)[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 371
Default Stainless vs. Non-Stick Pots

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:32:26 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>Oh pshaw, on Sun 25 Nov 2007 04:21:38p, Edwin Pawlowski meant to say...
>
>>
>> "qquito" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Generally speaking, what are the pros and cons for non-stick as well
>>> as stainless cookwares? How about the Stainless Non-Stick ones if
>>> there indeed such things?
>>>
>>> Thank you for reading and replying!
>>>
>>> --Roland

>>
>> For pots, you can't beat good stainless steel for 99.9% of all uses.
>> Easy to clean and keep nice looking. Buy a good brand and it will last
>> you 40 to 75 years. Buy a coated pot and toss in in a couple of years.
>>

>
>I have and use only 1 non-stick pan, and that's used almost exclusively for
>scrambling eggs with no added fat or release spray.


I thought the same thing when I read the OP. Eggs and infrequently
crepes.
--

modom

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com