"Little Malice" > wrote in message
...
> One time on Usenet, Sheldon > said:
>
>> > In article >,
>> > (Little Malice) wrote:
>> >
>> > > One time on Usenet, Janet Baraclough >
>> > > said:=
>>
>> > > > The message >
>> > > > from "cybercat" > contains these words:
>> >
>> > > > > Usenet IS a free-for-all. Whether it should be or not, it is, and
>> > > > > it=
>> has
>> > > > > always been. It has not changed at all, except those who have
>> > > > > used
>> > > > > it for years are now more savvy.
>> >
>> > > > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BDObviously you have not used it for years, or you
>> > > > wo=
>> uld be aware of
>> > > > how much it has changed for the worse.
>> >
>> > > I had a similar thought. Usenet has NOT always been a "free-for-all".
>> > > Not until AOL was loosed upon it, anyway. Anyone who was reading
>> > > before then knows how much that changed things...
>
> <snip>
>
>> With that kind of comment you must think black folks should ride in
>> the back of the bus... you don't like change.
>
> What strange logic! Have you ever had a CAT scan?
>
>> People repeat nonsense
>> often enough they believe it... I'm sure you have yourself convinced
>> that your shit doesn't stink.
>
> Spoken like a true AOLer...
>
> --
> Jani in WA


CT scan.
Dee Dee