On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:07:34 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
> wrote:

>"Lou Decruss" > wrote in message
.. .
>
>> This would have been a good survey.
>
>
>Why? The same 8 or 10 participants would've responded to the survey, which
>provides numbers, but no explanations. Then, the same participants would've
>ALSO posted messages. Surveys are redundant and stupid for this newsgroup.
>

Surveys are fun and often generate a thread as a result. Other times
a thread generates a survey. Since you find them redundant, just
ignore them.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first