frank87 wrote:
> On 2008-01-05, pearl > expressed:
>> "frank87" > wrote in message ...
>>> On 2007-08-24, Whining, Crying, Bawl > expressed:
>>>> http://www.notmilk.com
>>>>
>>> What's wrong with milk.
>> You've just ignored some evidence of what's wrong with milk.
> There is too much talk on the site about people pushing milk. I didn't
> find good arguments against it.
>
> The only argument I found was that lots of people are allergic. People
> are alergic to lots of products (peanurts, garlic, potatos) are those
> bad for you too?
>
> So why milk and not peanuts (peanuts can kill, did you know?)
>
> The only reason I can think of, is that it is something personal. (did a
> cow kill your daddy? Did your sister drown in milk?)
>> What's wrong with you?
>
> Nothing, I'm not fighting a stupid fight to ban milk.

Agreed 100% Frank...

There are just as many well founded/scientifically confirmed positive
aspects relating to milk (and all manner of other animal based foods)as
there are negatives... just as with practically any non-animal material.

Some people are allergic to pure WATER, fer God's sakes...

It simply boils down to personal aversions to any particular food item -
be it animal or vegetable in origin.

I've never yet seen a genuinely irrefutable and compelling reason to
stop using animal products, per-se (obviously I am not allergic, for
starters...). Personal preference only.



--
May God protect you from his followers.