Dave Smith wrote:

> "l, not -l" wrote:
>
>
>>
>> > It's weird that as much as we all think we know the word "gullible"
>> > it's not actually in the dictionaries.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Blinky
>>
>> Guess it depends on your ditionary; it's in my hardbound Websters
>> Unabridged and the Merriam-Webster online;
>> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?gullible
>
> Maybe he was just fishing to see who was gullible enough to look it up.
> :-)

It's an old Usenet tradition. This is the first time I've pulled it out
in a long time. Happily, the hook seems to have been fully embedded in a
lip.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net