Sqwertz wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:01:18 GMT, blake murphy wrote:
>
> > i suppose you can't argue with results. but then again, you get
> > results by shooting fish in a barrel.
>
> Shooting fish in a barrel (assuming it's full of water), is
> really not that easy.

Mythbusters concluded that it was. They didn't shoot any live fish, but
it was easy to hit either models or dead ones. Additionally, they
concluded that the shock waves of bullets hitting would kill fish
whether you hit them or not.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)