Elflord wrote:
> On 2008-02-22, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> pearl wrote:
>>> 'For a Nebraskan, going vegetarian means going against the grain
>> Nothing but style elevated over substance.
>>
>> Humans are naturally omnivores.
>
> That's fine, as long as you're careful not to confuse nature for morality.

No confusion, but once again, the onus is on "vegans"
and other believers in animal "rights" to explain how
something that was both biologically and behaviorally
natural, and that appeared in a pre-morality era, could
become judged as immoral. Don't bother with the usual
and tired comparison to slavery, which is strictly a
cultural and behavioral artifact, and which is further
dismissable on the grounds that the slaves themselves
felt their rights were being violated and could express
that belief.