"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
> pearl wrote:
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
> >> pearl wrote:
> >>> "Elflord" > wrote in message ...
> >>>> On 2008-02-22, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >>>>> pearl wrote:
> >>>>>> 'For a Nebraskan, going vegetarian means going against the grain
> >>>>> Nothing but style elevated over substance.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Humans are naturally omnivores.
> >>>> That's fine,
> >>> Humans are biologically (and psychologically) frugivores.
> >> Meaningless.
> >
> > Well into the 21st century, it's about time humans knew what
> > kind of animal we are. Many believe humans are omnivores!
> >
> >> "Psychologically" is bullshit, anyway; no such thing.
> >
> > Psychology is a very important aspect of human nature.
>
> Humans are not "psychologically" frugivores. The claim
> is meaningless bullshit.

To you, certainly.

'in·hu·man
adj.
1. Lacking kindness, pity, or compassion; cruel.
2. Deficient in emotional warmth; cold.
3. Not suited for human needs: an inhuman environment.
4. Not of ordinary human form; monstrous.
...
inhuman
adj 1: without compunction or human feeling; "in cold blood";
"cold-blooded killing"; "insensate destruction" [syn: cold,
cold-blooded, insensate] 2: belonging to or resembling something
nonhuman; "something dark and inhuman in form"; "a babel of
inhuman noises"
...'
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?qinhuman

> >> Being a "frugivore" does not mean "doesn't naturally
> >> eat meat".
> >
> > 'According to Tuttle,
>
> You've never read Tuttle. Shut your ****ing mouth.

Not celebrating your *10,000+* 'one star' average rating?