pearl wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
>> pearl wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>> "Elflord" > wrote in message ...
>>>>>> On 2008-02-22, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>>>>> 'For a Nebraskan, going vegetarian means going against the grain
>>>>>>> Nothing but style elevated over substance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Humans are naturally omnivores.
>>>>>> That's fine,
>>>>> Humans are biologically (and psychologically) frugivores.
>>>> Meaningless.
>>> Well into the 21st century, it's about time humans knew what
>>> kind of animal we are. Many believe humans are omnivores!
>>>
>>>> "Psychologically" is bullshit, anyway; no such thing.
>>> Psychology is a very important aspect of human nature.
>> Humans are not "psychologically" frugivores. The claim
>> is meaningless bullshit.
>
> To you, certainly.

It's just unsupported crazy bullshit, period. You made
it up. It is meaningless to say that humans are
"psychologically" frugivores; utterly meaningless bullshit.


>>>> Being a "frugivore" does not mean "doesn't naturally
>>>> eat meat".
>>> 'According to Tuttle,
>> You've never read Tuttle. Shut your ****ing mouth.
>
> Not celebrating

non sequitur

You never read "Tuttle"; you've never read *any*
original material. You've done nothing but slavishly
copypasta stuff from web pages, and you don't even
understand the stuff you sloppily copypasta.