pearl wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
>> pearl wrote:
>>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message ...
>>>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>>>> "Elflord" > wrote in message ...
>>>>>>>> On 2008-02-22, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> pearl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 'For a Nebraskan, going vegetarian means going against the grain
>>>>>>>>> Nothing but style elevated over substance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Humans are naturally omnivores.
>>>>>>>> That's fine,
>>>>>>> Humans are biologically (and psychologically) frugivores.
>>>>>> Meaningless.
>>>>> Well into the 21st century, it's about time humans knew what
>>>>> kind of animal we are. Many believe humans are omnivores!
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Psychologically" is bullshit, anyway; no such thing.
>>>>> Psychology is a very important aspect of human nature.
>>>> Humans are not "psychologically" frugivores. The claim
>>>> is meaningless bullshit.
>>> To you, certainly.
>> It's just unsupported crazy bullshit, period. You made
>> it up. It is meaningless to say that humans are
>> "psychologically" frugivores; utterly meaningless bullshit.
>
> You don't get it.

I do get it: "psychologically" frugivores is utterly
meaningless bullshit.


>>>>>> Being a "frugivore" does not mean "doesn't naturally
>>>>>> eat meat".
>>>>> 'According to Tuttle,
>>>> You've never read Tuttle. Shut your ****ing mouth.
>>> Not celebrating
>> non sequitur
>
> Very sequitur.

non sequitur


>> You never read "Tuttle"; you've never read *any*
>> original material. You've done nothing but slavishly
>> copypasta stuff from web pages, and you don't even
>> understand the stuff you sloppily copypasta.
>
> Evasion,

You've never read Tuttle. You did a slovenly copypasta
off that "vegan" extremist/terrorist Coleman's BULLSHIT
site. That BULLSHIT he says about Tuttle is unsourced
and secondary.