Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
> In article >,
> Little Malice > wrote:
>> One time on Usenet, said:
>>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:34:52 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ophelia
>
> Charlotte L. Blackmer (would I make a name like this up? I ask you.)
>
>>> Nobody here cares what her real name is.
>>
>> I do! I hope to visit her part of the world someday. ;-)
>
> But that's different from some anon jerk trying to make a big deal of
> it by oUt1NG!1!! her, by a long shot.
>
>> Seriously though, I'm surprised at how many people use their full
>> real name in this group. After a death threat in my early Usenet
>> days, I stopped using my last name.
>
> I've been there myself, so I understand.
>
> I'm pseudonymous other places (one of which I signed up for when I was
> actively being followed around the intarwebs). Enough people know my
> real name, etc., etc. (which is on the email I used to sign up with)
> but the identifying details are a bit masked in publicly-searchable
> bits. (I have an unusual surname, so most of the google hits on
> first name+last name are me.)
>
>> I have no problem with other
>> folks using psuedonyms. I don't need their life story, just their
>> recipe for a good batch of fudge...
>
> Yep. Pseudonyms are one thing, anon remailing Outing Filth cowards
> quite another .
>

Thank you Charlotte, as you may have seen, Janet Baraclough was doing it a
couple of days ago and now a sock puppet. Of course, they coudn't possibly
be connected????? Yes, she is filth. Not only is she doing it here but in
all my groups. That filth is also a coward.