Ophelia wrote:
> Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
>> In article >,
>> Little Malice > wrote:
>>> One time on Usenet, said:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:34:52 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ophelia
>>
>> Charlotte L. Blackmer (would I make a name like this up? I ask you.)
>>
>>>> Nobody here cares what her real name is.
>>>
>>> I do! I hope to visit her part of the world someday. ;-)
>>
>> But that's different from some anon jerk trying to make a big deal of
>> it by oUt1NG!1!! her, by a long shot.
>>
>>> Seriously though, I'm surprised at how many people use their full
>>> real name in this group. After a death threat in my early Usenet
>>> days, I stopped using my last name.
>>
>> I've been there myself, so I understand.
>>
>> I'm pseudonymous other places (one of which I signed up for when I
>> was actively being followed around the intarwebs). Enough people
>> know my real name, etc., etc. (which is on the email I used to sign
>> up with) but the identifying details are a bit masked in
>> publicly-searchable bits. (I have an unusual surname, so most of
>> the google hits on first name+last name are me.)
>>
>>> I have no problem with other
>>> folks using psuedonyms. I don't need their life story, just their
>>> recipe for a good batch of fudge...
>>
>> Yep. Pseudonyms are one thing, anon remailing Outing Filth cowards
>> quite another .
>>
>
> Thank you Charlotte, as you may have seen, Janet Baraclough was doing
> it a couple of days ago and now a sock puppet. Of course, they
> coudn't possibly be connected????? Yes, she is filth. Not only is
> she doing it here but in all my groups.

What Ophelia has neglected to mention is that Baraclough is getting a
similar response to her madness in every group that she posts. No one is in
the least bit interested. :-D

--
Enzo

I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.