On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:03:07 -0700, "Janet Bostwick"
> wrote:

>blake murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 06:51:03 -0700, "Janet Bostwick"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:34:58 -0800, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It really surprises me, with all the latest developments in camera
>>>>> surveillance systems, that no one has even thought about monitoring
>>>>> the kitchen areas of restaurants with cameras and recording the
>>>>> results for a certain number of days. However, IMHO, they should do
>>>>> just that, and clearly post signs in the kitchen notifying the
>>>>> staff they are being monitored and recorded.
>>>>
>>>> Logan's Roadhouse's grills are behind a glass wall where the
>>>> customers can see in. If that doesn't stop the cooks from
>>>> ****ing with the food, then nothing will.
>>>>
>>>> You could also put up web cams and offer in-house surveillance of
>>>> the kitchen from the customers table for anyone with a laptop.
>>>> Or just have a monitor on each table.
>>>>
>>>> Or they could offer fecal, saliva, and human DNA test strips for
>>>> your food. They would come rolled up in your hermetically-sealed
>>>> napkin along with the autoclaved silverware.
>>>>
>>>> Or... Or...
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Don't you think this happens with any regularity? If you don't,
>>> then you haven't heard (or overheard) teenage boys or young men
>>> bragging about it. Janet
>>>
>>
>> and teenage boys and young men would never lie about such a thing.
>> make sure to ask them about their sex lives, too.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
>Now how do you suppose this happened?
>http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/29....ap/index.html
>Flks with a mind-set to spit in the mashed potatoes go on to bigger things.
>Janet
>

obviously a poorly-conceived smuggling scheme.

your pal,
blake