In article >,
"Janet Bostwick" > wrote:

> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Goomba38 > wrote:
> >
> >> Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> >>> "Janet Bostwick" > dropped this
> >>> : in rec.food.cooking
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I wish I was stupid like she is. . .her drive and ambition have
> >>>> made her mega bucks.
> >>>
> >>> IMO she is just plain lazy and has no culinary talent (not that I do
> >>> either). IMO she also got where she is by marrying into bucks so
> >>> she could finance her desire to be in the spotlight. I don't
> >>> consider that drive and ambition. Martha Stewart has drive and
> >>> ambition. Rachel Ray (gag) has drive and ambition. IMO SL has
> >>> nothing. I have to as myself if the wallet hadn't been around,
> >>> where would she have been?
> >>>
> >> I thought all that too until I saw her biography on FoodTV.
> >
> > Is that the one that never even mentions the zillionaire she married?
> >
> > --
> > Star Trek 09:
> O.k., now you guys are getting my dander up. . .are you saying that a woman
> can't be a success without a rich husband?

No, we're saying "woman has lame ideas; woman marries filthy rich
sponsor; woman gets TV show; filthy rich sponsor dumps her for Martha
Stewart; woman writes bio ignoring filth rich husband and claiming to be
totally self made" doesn't ring true.

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg