Unethical Dreck Nash and his omission of context
"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message k.net...
> Derek wrote:
> > "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message k.net...
> >
> >>Dreck lied about my logic.
> >
> > Here's the complete thread which proves you're the
> > hypocrite as described in your opening post to this
> > thread when you wrote;
> > "People who advocate that everyone adopt a moral
> > standard that the advocates themselves don't follow
> > are hypocrites, and bad people."
>
> That's a true statement: people who advocate that
> everyone adopt a moral standard that the advocates
> themselves don't follow *are* hypocrites, and bad
> people.
>
That's you.
> >
> > Because you earlier wrote;
> >
> > "According to my logic, if you knowingly continue
> > to buy chocolate - we know YOU do, you fat
> > lard-ass - then YOU do not respect the rights of
> > the children. It doesn't prove they don't have any;
> > it proves YOU don't believe they do."
> > Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-07-29
>
> Right, shitbag: my logic is that you do not respect
> the rights you claim the children have.
..... if you knowingly buy chocolate from them.
> But earlier,
> you lied and said that my "logic" is that if you
> knowingly buy the chocolate, it means the children
> don't have rights.
Which is exactly the same thing, stupid. You're a fool.
> That was not my logic, shitbag.
> You lied.
>
Re-read it. You're saying the same thing twice.
|