"Joseph Littleshoes" > wrote in message
.. .
> jmcquown wrote:
>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
>>> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being
>>> inappropriate.
>>>
>>>>
>> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know
>> this.
>
> Now your claiming to be a 'mind reader' as well as a style maven?
>
> Must be nice having that kind of omniscience, not only knowing what every
> body else knows, but knowing me better than i know my self.
>
> This isn't "thread drift",
>
> Yes it is. As well as my own epistolary creativity.
>
> your suggested recipe is a totally
>> different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash.
>>
> D'uh!
>
>> Jill
>
> I disagree, go back and read "Goomba's" comment that i was commenting on,
> that was a comment on technique i merely expanded on.
> --

You are giving this silly, self-important bitch wayyy too much unction here,
Joseph. Life is short enough already.