Jonathan Kamens <Jonathan Kamens >>
wrote:

> Sqwertz > writes:
>>It was a bad example. There are plenty of manufacturers using the
>>(K) and (U)'s onm their complete product line. That doesn't make
>>them sell better, nor imply they're quality products.
>
> Several people have provided references to third-party market studies
> and quotes from manufacturers about the fact that products with kosher
> certifications sell better. You have, in response, provided only your
> opinion that they don't. Considering that you're an anti-semitic
> twit, your opinion isn't really worth reliable on this subject.

And I pointed out the faults in several of those comments.

As for being anti-semite, you do a good job of enforcing this. I
think anybody who follows religion this closely is a moron, so don't
take it personally.

>>> Empire chicken consistently wins blind taste tests.
>>
>>Because it's salted. Kosher poultry often contains more fat as
>>well.
>
> My, aren't you good at changing the subject. You said that there's no
> rational reason for people to buy kosher Empire chicken rather than
> non-kosher chicken.

Oh, so now you're making up quotes from me, putting words into my
mouth?

This is where your case falls apart - when you rest to these kinds
of tactics.

> Perhaps rather than trying to change the subject you should simply
> admit that you were wrong and move on.

Ahh, now you've jumped from misquoting what I said, falsely accuse
me of evading the *your* subject, and claim victory. Typical Kook
style.

Why is religious people make the best hypocrites?

-sw