pearl wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>pearl wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" > wrote in message
rthlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>pearl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>our Reichstag fire ( 9/11 -- there's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>evidence Bush knew about it beforehand,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Show it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Plenty to chew on (and spit out), here;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/91...ush/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That moron's page offers no evidence, just his
>>>>>>>>irrational ravings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Who are you trying to smear exactly???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No one, skank.
>>>>>
>>>>>Who is 'that moron', moron?
>>>>
>>>>The moron who crapped together that irrational
>>>>conspiracy page you linked; you know, the irrational
>>>>conspiracy page you HAD to link.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Why did you snip these links, ball?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because they are just MORE irrational, unsupported
>>>>>>conspiracy bullshit. They're taking well known, well
>>>>>>publicized bits and pieces of intelligence, and trying
>>>>>>to suggest that the *specific* 9/11 attack that
>>>>>>happened was known in advance by the Bush
>>>>>>administration and by Bush himself. It's shit. U.S.
>>>>>>and other western intelligence knew al Qaeda were up to
>>>>>>something, but they didn't know exactly what, when or
>>>>>>where.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ipse unsupported evasive dixit, ball.
>>>>>
>>>>>Pentagon says Sept. 11 interceptors flew:
>>>>>TOO FAR, TOO SLOW, TOO LATE
>>>>>by William Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>Senior Correspondent lifeboatnews.com
>>>>
>>>>In other words, another moron. "lifeboatnews.com" is
>>>>anything but news. It's unadulterated bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>"William Thomas" seems to be the author of "Chemtrails
>>>>Confirmed"; that proves he's a nut, just like you.
>>>>"Chemtrails" is on the loooooong list of irrational
>>>>beliefs you hold.
>>>
>>>
>>>Your carpet must be really hard to walk on, ball.
>>
>>Your sources are all crap. There's not a shred of
>>documented evidence of any of it, just the irrational
>>ravings of uneducated goofs like you.
>
>
> More ad hominem ipse dixit

Nope. The sources are crap. Not one of them offers
any corroborated evidence, just loony raving.

"Chemtrails", "inner earth beings", "zappers" - this is
all the stuff of paranoid lowlifes. It's all bunk.