Steve Pope > wrote:

> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>>That's nice. But I never mentioned foreign aid. At least not
>>formal the kind of foreign aid you're referring to. I'm talking
>>about the contributions and investments U.S. companies have made and
>>enabled in India.
>
> So any sort of capitalist/imperialist expansion into the developing
> world might be positioned as "aid". Nice.

Again, I never said the word 'aid'. My point was that India would
be a lot worse off if it wasn't for the U.S. (some would say the
opposite is true, too).

As it is, India is experiencing a thriving new economy that was
enabled by U.S. companies expansion into their country.

You can re-word my viewpoint to suit your needs any way you want.
Go ahead.

-sw