"Russ Thompson" > wrote in message
...
> > It seems like PETA is saying that the game management using hunting
drives
> > up deer population in response to the
> > depletion. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me but if its so easy to
> tear
> > down then why wasn't the argument addressed?
> >
> > -Rubystars
>
> *** Maybe cause they, like me don't know how a deer population could be
> artificially inflated and would consider it a silly question.

I consider it silly too and think PETA is blowing hot air like usual, but
then, I've never really
looked into this.

> On the other hand there may really be a way to do it that I don't know
> about and they are ducking the question.

If it was too silly to dignify with an explanation they could have at least
said so (an
explanation would have been much more informative for people like me
though). As it is,
the article seems to have a huge gap in it.

-Rubystars