"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
news
> cybercat wrote:
>
>>
>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>>>> news >>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>>>>>> e...
>>>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech,
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> your
>>>>>
>>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>>>> a branch of government.
>>>>>
>>>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>>>>
>>>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via
>>>
>>> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
>>>
>>>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
>>>> Period.
>>>
>>> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will choose
>>> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
>>>
>>> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from Google
>> Groups is what?
>
> "The worthwhile Gropers are few enough to be insignificant to me in the
> scope of the lame-brains and spammers; and because I dislike the
> watering-down of Usenet via web gateways, of which GG is the largest
> offender, I choose not to cooperate by reading articles from its users."
>
> Clear enough? Of course, you don't *get* it; but it should be clear
> enough.
>
>> Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
>> Groups, Oh Blinking One?
>
> I've never been bashful about explaining my reasons. Hell, I created a
> whole web site about the issue, and the link is never further away than
> my sig. So why do I have to reinvent the wheel for you here? You know
> how to read websites, right? So no more hand-holding. Follow the link
> if you wish to become educated. Blinky out -- on this topic, as far as
> repeating everything that's there, for you.
>
>

I know the reason, and so do you. You give new meaning to the
characterization
of sharks as prehistoric creatures.

The "watering down of Usenet," as though Usenet is some precious pool
instead
of the cesspool it has always been.

What a steaming crock of horseshit. You're an assbackwards elitist, yet
another
person trying to elevate himself by denigrating others according to your
prejudices.
Blecch.

You suck, Blinky. It would be bad enough without your being so damned
pleased
with your suckyass self.

Ick, ick, ick.