"sf" <.> wrote in message ...
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:50:39 -0400, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"blake murphy" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:54:48 -0400, "cybercat" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"blake murphy" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:45:19 -0700 (PDT), aem >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jun 5, 5:31 pm, Christine Dabney > wrote:
>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>> The thing that is not so hot with nonstick, is that one doesn't
>>>>>>> produce a fond: it all sticks to whatever is being cooked. Hence,
>>>>>>> when a pan is deglazed, there is no residual to add to the flavor,
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> color, or whatever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Correct. You can't get a proper browning and you can't make a good
>>>>>>pan sauce. I imagine millions of cooks, especially Americans, who try
>>>>>>some kind of saute recipe and don't know why it seems blah. The only
>>>>>>thing a nonstick pan is good for is frying eggs with minimal oil or
>>>>>>butter. -aem
>>>>>
>>>>> i can't even abide non-stick for eggs. i'm not afraid of a little
>>>>> butter. cleaning a stainless steel pan is not a big deal.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I absolutely HATE stainless steel, even in mixing bowls.
>>>>
>>>>Everybody gets to be who they are.
>>>>
>>>
>>> i don't like steel bowls either, so there you are.
>>>
>>
>>Then maybe I be you fwend also.
>>
>
> Hey, *I* like steel bowls.....
>

^ ^
~ ~
vwv *hissssssss*