On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:


>> > wrote:
>> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>>
>> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>
>> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
>> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>>
>> >N.
>>
>> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
>> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
>restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
>little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.

The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything
it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too.

Lou