On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:56:23 -0400, "Kswck" >
wrote:

>
> wrote in message
...
>>
>> James Silverton wrote:
>>> Nancy2 wrote on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:27:26 -0700 (PDT):
>>>
>>> > On Jun 12, 8:28 am, enigma > wrote:
>>> >> Steve Y > wrote
>>> >> :
>>> >>
>>> > >> Why ? Are you worried they might start adding Taste and
>>> > >> Flavour to your "beer" ?
>>> >>
>>> >> no kidding...
>>> >> although it most likely wouldn't have any noticable effect
>>> >> at all on the "beer". it wouldn't make sense to actually add
>>> >> good ingredients like hops & grain to it if the public is
>>> >> more than willing to pay for horse ****.
>>>
>>> > Who is the arbiter of what is "good beer?" It's all
>>> > subjective. I happen to like Miller Lite. Maybe <I> am the
>>> > defining taster, and all the prissy "microbrews" are horse
>>> > ****.
>>>
>>> Drink what you like of course but why insult others' tastes? It's simply
>>> not worth the trouble to say that you do or don't like a popular beer.
>>> Budweiser seems to sell pretty well in Britain even if I only like it
>>> cold enough to have floating ice crystals .
>>>
>> We have some British style Brew Pubs I like that know how to serve a
>> nice guiness, give me a good warm guiness please. Kind of expensive,
>> but after picking it up and a sip all is good.
>>
>> Many of the bars serve only PBR Pabst on tap, that is one I cannot
>> stand. I'm not much of a bar person but they did outlaw smoking in our
>> bars. I'll smoke one ever now and then but despise taking a shower in
>> the AM and relive the night by smelling that smoke that I was exposed
>> to the night before. Being around A hundred or two people who are
>> smoking about to smoke or had just smoked is is not much fun..
>
>
>PBR-Ugh! One long weekend in college-only thing we could afford. Never
>again. I get nauseous just looking at it.
>

pabst *is* pretty nasty. it has its partisans, though.

your pal,
blake