Kathleen wrote:

> T wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>
>>>
>>>"Kathleen" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>>>
>>>>T wrote:
>>>
>>> Lifepsans are increasing little
>>>
>>>>>by little but I think in the next few years we'll see exponential
>>>>>increases in life spans.
>>>>
>>>>I think we'll see an increase in lifespans but "exponential"? Not likely.
>>>>We see the occasional 100 year old, but I have serious doubts we'll be
>>>>seeing 1,000 year olds any time soon.
>>>
>>>Heaven forfend! Buy stock in spackle companies if you think 1000 years is a
>>>possibility. Smash all the mirrors. How will I ever get my stockings on
>>>even at 110?
>>
>> This is the mistake a lot of people make when you talk about extending
>> human lifespans.
>
> And so is using a word like "exponential" when you clearly don't know
> what it means.

I'll see your comment and raise you a power.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se