Lying Larry Forti wrote:

> Jonathan Ball > wrote in message
> om...
>
>
>>>The Los Angeles Times
>
> Ah yes, a well known source of valid scientific information.

The Times reported on a peer-reviewed article in the
Quarterly Review of Biology, Lying Larry. Are you
claiming the Times got the story wrong, Lying Larry?
Prove it.

>
>
>>>Chomping too many fatty steaks is unhealthy for the
>>>heart - but the consequences would be worse if human
>>>beings hadn't evolved special, "meat-adaptive" genes to
>>>help manage saturated fat, cholesterol and other
>>>hazards of meat-eating, according to two USC scientists.
>
> With "heart disease" being responsible for 29%, and cancers responsible
> for 22.9%, of all deaths, it seems these imaginary "meat-adaptive genes"
> have not "adapted" us very well.

Try to refute the conclusions of Drs. Finch and
Stanford, Lying Larry. Leave your ignorance of
EVERYTHING connected with this topic aside, and try to
refute the two Ph.D.s if you think you can - with
SCIENCE, Lying Larry, not your polemical miscitation of
some health statistics you don't understand in the
first place.

> http://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broke...y=ALL&_debug=0
> IF humans had "adapted" to flesh-eating, the unhealthy conditions and
> terminal diseases it causes would have been reduced to zero

PROVE that, Lying Larry. An adaptation to something
doesn't require that the adaptation be what you, in
your infinite ignorance, would consider "perfect".

> IF any "adaptation" had occurred. Epidemiology proves that no such "adaptation"
> ever occurred.

No, it doesn't. And YOU, Lying Larry Forti, have ZERO
expertise in epidemiology. Stop pretending you have any.

>
>
>>>... anthropologist Craig Stanford said they had identified at least
>>>eight genes ...
>
> Hmmm. Anthro-apologists are not qualified to do genetic research.

In fact, Lying Larry, if you had bothered to do even
some cursory research instead of running your fat
ignorant hate-filled mouth, you would have learned that
Dr. Caleb Finch, with a Ph.D. in BIOLOGY, is the lead
author of the PEER-REVIEWED article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0322081608.htm

If you had done just a tiny bit more research, Lying
Larry, instead of running your ignorant mouth, you'd
have learned that Professor Stanford is the head of the
Ph.D. program in BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY at the
University of Southern California.

You stink, Forti.


> Unencumbered by real science, as a group, anthro-apologists

Prove that, Lying Larry. You can't even get started.
Those guys have forgotten more science from their first
semester of university than you have even dreamed of in
your entire shit-stained life, Forti, because YOU
HAVEN'T DONE ANY SCIENCE.

[snip fatuous references to Forti's own pages of deceit]

>
>
>>>"Even though we have this idea that we are
>>>hypersensitive to cholesterol and fat, the fact is that
>>>humans as a species are relatively immune to the
>>>harmful effects of these things," Stanford said.
>
> Yet, such "immunity" is disproven by current epidemiology.

No, it isn't, Forti, and YOU are completely UNQUALIFIED
to discuss epidemiology, as you have never studied it
AT ALL: a great big ZERO.

>
>
>>>One of the genes is called apoE. A particular form of
>>>that gene, known as apoE3, evolved in humans some time
>>>after the divergence of humans from chimps. ApoE3 is
>>>known to help protect human beings against heart
>>>disease.
>
> Not much "protection" if "heart disease" is responsible for 29% of all
> deaths in the US.
>
>
>> You asshole -
>
> Jon-a-thug noBalls,

You go eat shit and die, Forti, you piece of filth.

>
>
>>haven't you
>>maintained, in your utter IGNORANCE of science, that there is no
>>genetic adaptation in humans for meat eating?
>
> I still maintain

....with ZERO support for your polemical contention, and
NO ****ING PRAYER of finding any...

> that there is NO "genetic adaptation in humans for meat
> eating",

Dr. Caleb Finch, with a Ph.D. in BIOLOGY, and Dr. Craig
Stanford, with a Ph.D. in BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, say
you're wrong. They say you're wrong in their recently
published PEER-REVIEWED article in a prestigious
journal of BIOLOGY, Lying Larry.

Uh...where's YOUR peer-reviewed article, Forti, you
filthy lying polemicist? Haw haw haw!

> and you have not ever been able to provide ANY evidence of such.

Dr. Finch and Stanford, both Ph.D.s, have INDEED
provided evidence of "such", Lying Larry. Stop lying.


> Current epidemiology proves

Shut your ****ING MOUTH about "current epidemiology",
you lying asshole. You don't know ANYTHING about
epidemiology. You aren't qualified to wash the toilets
at any journal of epidemiology.

>
>
>>Yet here we see REAL scientists - asserts there is indeed a
>>genetic adaptation in humans for meat eating.
>
> They did not say anything in a authoritative or conclusive manner.

Prove that, Lying Larry. You HAVE NOT read their
article, so you are in no position to say.


> They did not assert there is a "genetic adaptation in humans for meat
> eating",

They certainly did.

> they did not PROVE that it exists, they hypothesized it.

RIGHT, science-illiterate Lying Larry: because REAL
science, unlike the tea-leaf reading and totem-touching
crapola you stupidly and IGNORANTLY miscall "science",
doesn't EVER claim to have "proved" something. REAL
science, Lying Larry, is ALWAYS presented as hypotheses.

You wouldn't know anything about that.
>
>
>>Are you going to admit you were wrong, Loser Larry? Not just wrong,
>>but *knowingly* ignorant? You didn't know ANYTHING about whether or
>>not there is a genetic adaptation in humans for eating meat, Lying
>>Loser Larry; you were just running your ignorant mouth.
>
> Such [snip Lying Larry's blah-blah-blah hand-waving]

Admit it NOW, Forti you cheap charlatan: you don't
know ANYTHING about genetics, epidemiology, nutrition,
or ANY of the crap on your "ecologicfree" pages.

You're a sick, juvenile JOKE, Forti.

When you have a PEER-REVIEWED article that refutes the
conclusions of Dr. Finch and Dr. Stanford, Lying Larry,
get back to us. Until then, shut up.