In article 0>,
says...
> On Tue 08 Jul 2008 03:35:42p, T told us...
>
> > In article 0>,
> > says...
> >> On Mon 07 Jul 2008 03:12:43p, Mark Thorson told us...
> >>
> >> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon 07 Jul 2008 11:48:11a, Steve Pope told us...
> >> >>
> >> >> > Where I live, there's a junk food tax on candy bars that kids
> >> >> > might eat like Mars or Snickers, but no such tax on chocolate
> >> >> > bars that yuppies eat like Sharffenberger or Green and Black.
> >> >> > Economic discrimination, I say.
> >> >>
> >> >> Age discrimination, I say. :-)
> >> >
> >> > Could be racial/class discrimination, like the way
> >> > the penalty for possessing crack cocaine is way
> >> > higher than for regular cocaine.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008...usdom18151.htm
> >>
> >> What do you suppose the penalty should be for a "foodie" possessing a
> can
> >> of Pringles?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Don't knock a Pringles can. With a threaded tube, nuts, washers, an
> > female N connector and some solder you can make a kick ass 802.11 yagi
> > (a very directional antennna.)
> >
>
> Yeah, I bet you could. It's the contents in serious qustions, though.
> Gawd, I haven't thought about antennas in years. :-)
>
>

Since Pringles are so cheap I'd just crush it up and feed it to the
birds then I could use the can for the point-to-point antenna system I
want to put together.