In article 0>,
says...
> On Tue 08 Jul 2008 05:37:43p, T told us...
>
> > In article 0>,
> > says...
> >> On Tue 08 Jul 2008 03:35:42p, T told us...
> >>
> >> > In article 0>,
> >> > says...
> >> >> On Mon 07 Jul 2008 03:12:43p, Mark Thorson told us...
> >> >>
> >> >> > Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon 07 Jul 2008 11:48:11a, Steve Pope told us...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Where I live, there's a junk food tax on candy bars that kids
> >> >> >> > might eat like Mars or Snickers, but no such tax on chocolate
> >> >> >> > bars that yuppies eat like Sharffenberger or Green and Black.
> >> >> >> > Economic discrimination, I say.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Age discrimination, I say. :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Could be racial/class discrimination, like the way
> >> >> > the penalty for possessing crack cocaine is way
> >> >> > higher than for regular cocaine.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008...usdom18151.htm
> >> >>
> >> >> What do you suppose the penalty should be for a "foodie" possessing a
> >> >> can of Pringles?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Don't knock a Pringles can. With a threaded tube, nuts, washers, an
> >> > female N connector and some solder you can make a kick ass 802.11 yagi
> >> > (a very directional antennna.)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yeah, I bet you could. It's the contents in serious qustions, though.
> >> Gawd, I haven't thought about antennas in years. :-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Since Pringles are so cheap I'd just crush it up and feed it to the
> > birds then I could use the can for the point-to-point antenna system I
> > want to put together.
> >
> >
>
> Poor little birds!
>
>

You should see the pigeons around these parts. They're fat, happy birds.
And the rats, they're pretty hefty too.