On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:01:08 -0700, sf wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:33:20 -0700, Mark Thorson >
>wrote:
>
>>sf wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:56:23 -0700, Mark Thorson >
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >When you're ubiquitous and omnipresent, you can
>>> >do those things, none of which means you won't be
>>> >easily irritated. The Biblical god is like that.
>>>
>>> I prefer the updated version of a forgiving god.
>>
>>Ah, yes. The *** marriage god.
>
>Yeah, that too. Don't sound so unsure of your manhood. It's
>unbecoming.
>
>It's fine by me if they join in front of a judge or pastor.
>Personally, I prefer to call it a "union" but the term "marriage" is
>fine as long as they are not only spiritually committed - they're
>legally committed too.

i can't imagine why people are so nutty about *** marriage. as thomas
jefferson said in another connection, 'it neither picks my pocket nor
breaks my leg.'

if *** people want to do something crazy like get married or join the
army, let 'em knock themselves out, i say.

your pal,
blake
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **