On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:39:24 -0700, anonymousNetUser
> wrote:
>Janet Wilder wrote:
>> Arri London wrote:
>>>
>>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>> On Jul 14, 2:24 pm, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>>> Andy wrote:
>>>>>> Goodbye Budweiser!
>>>>>> Depending on the shareholder vote, Anheiser Busch will become the
>>>>>> property of
>>>>>> !Bev a Belgium company.
>>>>>> There goes the neighborhood.
>>>>>> I shall not be drinking Bud Light any longer.
>>>>> Funny, but that is what a lot of people think when American
>>>>> businesses take over
>>>>> their local operations. At least the Belgians make good beer.
>>>> Somewhere in the back of my mind, I'm thinking the Clydesdales are
>>>> Belgian - are they?
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>
>>> No, originally from Scotland. Doubt the Belgian company would get rid
>>> of them...cheapest
>>> advertising/marketing tools they can have. No expensive contracts for
>>> fussy personnel data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e68dd/e68ddc8ac511f8bf72cf18574fec7aa4b5673560" alt="Smile"
>>
>> Have you ever seen the stable in St. Louis? Many people would be
>> thrilled to have a home half as nice as that stable. A lot of the
>> buildings at the brewery in St. Louis are on the National Historic
>> Register, too. What happens when foreigners buy something on the
>> National Historic Register? Does anyone know?????
>>
>
>All it means is that the place has been deemed worthy of keeping around.
>There are tax incentives to maintain them, so ownership isn't really a
>determining factor.
it also generally means you can't alter the building without approval.
your pal,
blake
** Posted from
http://www.teranews.com **