On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:25:27 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>On Thu 17 Jul 2008 07:07:09p, Julia Altshuler told us...
>
>> Alright, how about this?
>>
>>
>>
>> In order to pack the maximum number of people on a plane while still
>> insuring everyone gets a safe comfortable flight, the seats are taken
>> out. They're replaced with long thin palates arranged like bunks. At
>> security, as well as all carry-on luggage being inspected, all
>> passengers are frisked and shoes are removed. Then they're given an
>> injection which knocks them out. Airline personnel then wrap each
>> passenger in a sheet with a barcode on it, piles the now inert passenger
>> onto a luggage ramp, and loads the passengers into the plane, face up,
>> on the bunks. They all then snooze in a drugged suspended animation for
>> the duration of the trip.
>>
>>
>> At the other end, each cocoon is unloaded, unwrapped, and given a
>> reversal. Passengers come to, put on their shoes, and proceed to
>> baggage claim.
>>
>>
>> Instead of comparing meals, leg room, or service, passengers complain
>> about the effectiveness of the drugs, how dry their mouths are on
>> arrival, and their headaches. Instead of jetlag, people have to adjust
>> to the muzzy headed feeling the drugs give them. The drugs don't affect
>> everyone the same way. Some people get high. Drug addicts fly on
>> purpose for that reason. Getting high takes on a whole new meaning.
>>
>>
>> Jehovah Witnesses and other religious groups that don't drink object,
>> and the system is taken to the Supreme Court. Must one be given drugs
>> in order to fly? The immorality of unrelated male and female wrapped
>> passengers being lain side by side is also brought into question. In a
>> 5-4 decision, it is decided that flying is a privilege, not a right, and
>> those who wish to fly the old fashioned way may pay a premium price, but
>> since fewer and fewer airlines allow conscious passengers, a policy put
>> into the place, by the way, for the safety of ALL passengers in these
>> times of increased terrorist risk, religious zealots are dubbed luddites
>> and told to stay home. Further, it is pointed out, if they're not
>> willing to support American values by taking injections and flying, why
>> should they be allowed to benefit from our flying culture by eating
>> imported foods and living in houses made from flying technology ...
>>
>>
>> --Lia
>>
>>
>
>Lia, I thought they already did that.

you mean the c.i.a.? only certain flights to certain undisclosed
locations.

your pal,
blake
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **