"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> dejablues wrote:
>
>>
>> >> I just went back and checked the two links again. Yours does not have
>> >> the
>> > comments, which are worth reading. Almost everyone of the reader
>> > comments
>> > ridicules the women. And rightly so. They have a lot of gall to
>> > suggest
>> > that their situation is like the famine in Biafra or Ethiopia when it
>> > is
>> > so painfully obvious that these women are a long, long, long way from
>> > starving.
>>
>> Actually, they could be obese, but malnourished. Eating only cheap carbs
>> will leave their bodies starving for nutrients.
>
> Did you see the picture? Those women must weight 400 pounds each. They may
> be
> malnourished but they sure as hell aren't starving. They have a lot of
> nerve to
> compare their situation to Biafra or Ethiopia.

Perhaps taking a minute to actually read what you are replying to would
prevent you from sounding as ignorant as you do. First of all, the person
you replied to above stated the likely truth that they could be starving FOR
NUTRIENTS, which is not the same as starvation from hunger.

Second, the two women NEVER compared their situation to Biafra or Ethiopia.
The jackass that posted the article and then misformatted his own comments
is the one who said that.

And the only one here with alot of nerve is the one whose righteous
indignation was wrongly placed, not once but twice.

kimberly