On Mon, 17 May 2004 04:08:03 GMT, Wilson Woods > wrote:

wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 00:08:41 +0100, "JethroUK©" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>> for whom or what might it be "better"/"more moral"
>>>>>> if animals come into existence?
>>>
>>>It would be better for:
>>>
>>>1/ That particular animal
>>>2/ Animal Kind
>>>3/ My sandwich
>>>4/ World as a whole
>>
>>
>> Well, that's four things.
>
>Four unimportant and/or wrong pieces of crap.

We still have yet to learn for whom or
what it might be "better"/"more moral" to prevent them from
coming into existence. The "ARAs" consistently have nothing
to offer, and the Gonad is the best example of them all.