On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:44:32 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:03:57 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:04:31 GMT, Orlando Enrique Fiol
> wrote:
>>
wrote:
>>>>Curiously, throwing more money at the problem seems to be what many people
>>>>expect.
>>>
>>>Fiscal conservatives often like to remind us that throwing money at
>>>certain problems won't solve them. Yet, they're fine with our current
>>>war budget and money being thrown at religious education and faith-based
>>>charities. What they really mean is that poor people have had money
>>>thrown at them and it's proven not to work. In truth, many problems can
>>>in fact be solved with money. Give people more money and they can afford
>>>to live in better housing, eat better, etc. Of course, more money
>>>doesn't address people's educational inadequacies or lack of values.
>>>But, even when it comes to education, more money can mean smaller
>>>classes taught by better teachers who are better paid and not
>>>overworked.
>>>
>>
>>You know the saying: If it can be fixed with money, then it's not
>>really a problem.
>
>it ****ing well is if you don't have the money.
>
Reread the context.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West