On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:45:36 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
><sf> wrote in message ...
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:44:32 GMT, blake murphy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:03:57 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:04:31 GMT, Orlando Enrique Fiol
> wrote:
>>>>
wrote:
>>>>>>Curiously, throwing more money at the problem seems to be what many
>>>>>>people
>>>>>>expect.
>>>>>
>>>>>In truth, many problems can
>>>>>in fact be solved with money. Give people more money and they can afford
>>>>>to live in better housing, eat better, etc. Of course, more money
>>>>>doesn't address people's educational inadequacies or lack of values.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You know the saying: If it can be fixed with money, then it's not
>>>>really a problem.
>>>
>>>it ****ing well is if you don't have the money.
>>>
>> Reread the context.
>>
>>
>I don't need to. I got it the first time and he's right.
>
>
I see. You two are saying that voters and the community in general
(if they don't vote - they can participate through community hearings)
aren't part of the process of where to spend our tax dollars.



--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West