On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:57:33 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
><sf> wrote in message ...
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:45:36 -0400, "cybercat" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><sf> wrote in message ...
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:44:32 GMT, blake murphy
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:03:57 -0700, sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:04:31 GMT, Orlando Enrique Fiol
> wrote:
>>>>>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>Curiously, throwing more money at the problem seems to be what many
>>>>>>>>people
>>>>>>>>expect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In truth, many problems can
>>>>>>>in fact be solved with money. Give people more money and they can
>>>>>>>afford
>>>>>>>to live in better housing, eat better, etc. Of course, more money
>>>>>>>doesn't address people's educational inadequacies or lack of values.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You know the saying: If it can be fixed with money, then it's not
>>>>>>really a problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>it ****ing well is if you don't have the money.
>>>>>
>>>> Reread the context.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I don't need to. I got it the first time and he's right.
>>>
>>>
>> I see. You two are saying that voters and the community in general
>> (if they don't vote - they can participate through community hearings)
>> aren't part of the process of where to spend our tax dollars.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the
>> number of carats in a diamond.
>>
>Reread the context.
>
I included it. Your turn to read.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West