morbidly obese dog-beating dickhead wrote:
> You've snipped out a whole discussion concerning your
> view on natural predation and how you lied to avoid
> admitting it. And you criticize ME for unethical snipping?
Yes. That is all you ever do. Compare the following. The first is a post to
which you responded. The second is your response. Compare what parts of my post
you left intact. Click on the "complete thread" link and compare what little you
left from the posts which you replied.
http://snipurl.com/6kzz
http://snipurl.com/6l01
There was *no* name-calling in any of that, you fat ****ing liar. See also
http://snipurl.com/6l04 for an example of how you took me completely out of
context to make your pretext.
Starting with you...
------
> Nonsense. Every moral agent is entirely autonomous, fool.
Note your snip, asshole. That statement was qualified by what followed. Stop
taking things out of context to make a pretext.
RESTO
The autonomy the farmer has is pretty much limited to his choice to sell in the
free market in the first place. Beyond that, his decisions are borne of
prevailing market conditions. Farmers are free to niche market to people
concerned about pesticide use, GMOs, etc., and even CDs, but they will only do
that if there's a market for such effort so he can profit from it.
END RESTORE
What part of *that* do you specifically object?
------
You snipped that, and ended your reply from the above post with this (starting
and ending with your unethical snipping to take others out of context):
>> I hate to disappoint you, but farmers do have free will.
>
>I noted as much
Good.
http://snipurl.com/6l05
--------
The line that you edited contained NO name-calling. I wrote:
I noted as much about autonomy in what followed. Next time note your
snip about it.
Now what were you saying about not editing anyone else's posts? THAT was your
last straw, and THAT is when I decided to play your stupid game of editing your
posts. You started it and you have NO grounds for complaining, you big fat arsehole.
<...>