Dreck now claims he only snips name-calling. Consider the following.

The first is a post to which Dreck responded. The second is his response.
Compare what parts of my post he left intact. Click on the "complete thread"
link and compare what little he left from ANY of the posts which he replied.

http://snipurl.com/6kzz
http://snipurl.com/6l01

There was *no* name-calling in any of that. See also http://snipurl.com/6l04 for
an example of how Dreck took me completely out of context to make his pretext.

Starting with Dreck...
------
> Nonsense. Every moral agent is entirely autonomous, fool.

[I replied:]
Note your snip, asshole. That statement was qualified by what followed. Stop
taking things out of context to make a pretext.

RESTO
The autonomy the farmer has is pretty much limited to his choice to sell in the
free market in the first place. Beyond that, his decisions are borne of
prevailing market conditions. Farmers are free to niche market to people
concerned about pesticide use, GMOs, etc., and even CDs, but they will only do
that if there's a market for such effort so he can profit from it.
END RESTORE

What part of *that* do you specifically object?

------

He never answered the question. Instead, the fat clown completely snipped it and
ended his reply from the above post with this (starting and ending with your
unethical snipping to take others out of context):

[Dreck:]
>> I hate to disappoint you, but farmers do have free will.

[my partial reply, edited by the fat **** himself:]
>I noted as much

[Dreck:]
Good.

----
See last post at:
http://snipurl.com/6l05
--------

The line that Dreck edited contained NO name-calling. I *actually* wrote (before
he edited it down to suit his agenda):
I noted as much about autonomy in what followed. Next time note your
snip about it.

Now he says he doesn't edit anyone else's posts, except for name-calling. He is
a proven liar, and he's a baby who dishes out a lot of bullshit but cannot take
it when others return the favor.