On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:09:00 -0500, Michel Boucher
> wrote:


>Actually, I think it's even more elegant. The First Nations had no concept
>of ownership, sop consequently the land, to them, was both priceless and
>without any value. However, the concept of ownership andvalue are highly
>prized by the white man (kabloona, to the Inuit) and therefore they are
>using the white man's own tools for assimilation against him. Poetic as
>well as restorative justice.

So when the American Indians sold Manhattan island to the white folks,
they were ripping of the Honkies?
The land had no value, was worthless, and the white man nor anyone
else could own the land?

So the white man shouldn't be ****ed?