On Fri, 21 May 2004 22:47:02 GMT, usual suspect >
wrote:

[..]
>>>>Snipping without notation is a whole lot different to
>>>>editing your opponent's post,
>>>
>>>Wrong, fatso.
>>
>> Only someone such as yourself would fail to see the
>> wrong done in editing your opponent's posts against
>> the usual snipping done here.
>>
>> Unlike you, I don't edit my opponent's whole
>> sentence to suit before replying to it.
>
>Oh no? What the **** do you call this, lard ass?
>
>Yes, you do. That is all you ever do. Compare the following. The first is a post
>to which you responded. The second is your response. Compare what parts of my
>post you left intact. Click on the "complete thread" link and compare what
>little you left from the posts which you replied.
>
>http://snipurl.com/6kzz
>http://snipurl.com/6l01

Those examples are only where I've snipped without notation.
They don't show I've edited your sentences, liar.

>There was *no* name-calling in any of that, you fat ****ing liar. See also
>http://snipurl.com/6l04 for an example of how you took me completely out of
>context to make your pretext.
>
>Starting with you...
>------
> > Nonsense. Every moral agent is entirely autonomous, fool.
>
>Note your snip, asshole. That statement was qualified by what followed. Stop
>taking things out of context to make a pretext.
>
>RESTO
>The autonomy the farmer has is pretty much limited to his choice to sell in the
>free market in the first place. Beyond that, his decisions are borne of
>prevailing market conditions. Farmers are free to niche market to people
>concerned about pesticide use, GMOs, etc., and even CDs, but they will only do
>that if there's a market for such effort so he can profit from it.
>END RESTORE
>
>What part of *that* do you specifically object?
>
>------
>
>You snipped that

Again, just a snip of material I'd already gone over before
rather than the editing of whole sentences as you do. You
can't compare the two. What you do is downright dishonest
and unethical. You shouldn't EDIT your opponents posts
before replying to them.

[..]
>> I snip away your
>> childish rants and name-calling, but I don't edit your
>> sentences to suit before replying to them.
>
>Bullshit.

You haven't shown where I've edited your sentences.
You've shown where I've snipped stuff I've covered
before but you still haven't shown where I've EDITED
your sentences before replying to them. You, on the other
hand have edited mine and I've shown you the proof of
that with a link.

Follow this link http://tinyurl.com/2ox8r and it's short
thread from the beginning and you'll see that you edited
entire sentences of my posts before making your replies
to them. I snipped a few of your childish rants, but that
doesn't give you the excuse to edit my whole sentences
in return. You're unethical and a *damned* liar, "christian."
[..]