"ipse dixit" > wrote
> On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:36:17 GMT, wrote:

> >>"Suffering results for all animals whether they're
> >>eaten by humans or other animals. Indeed, many
> >>other predators are less humane than humans."
> >>usual suspect http://tinyurl.com/2ba7f
> >>
> >>It's clearly what you said, christian.
> >
> > Nonhuman predators can NOT be humane.

No they can't, but their actions frequently result in unmitigated pain and
suffering, and that is one definition of "cruel".

> According to "usual suspect" it's *cruel*, and that's
> the issue being raised here.

You aren't "raising an issue", sophist, you're engaging in a feeble
equivocation. An ARA named "nemo" chimed in earlier that, indeed, nature is
cruel. Respond to her

[..]