On Sat, 22 May 2004 01:20:06 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
>"ipse dixit" > wrote
>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 18:43:00 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
>> >"ipse dixit" > wrote
>> >> On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:36:17 GMT, wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>"Suffering results for all animals whether they're
>> >> >>eaten by humans or other animals. Indeed, many
>> >> >>other predators are less humane than humans."
>> >> >>usual suspect http://tinyurl.com/2ba7f
>> >> >>
>> >> >>It's clearly what you said, christian.
>> >> >
>> >> > Nonhuman predators can NOT be humane.
>> >
>> >No they can't, but their actions frequently result
>> >in unmitigated pain and suffering, and that is one
>> >definition of "cruel".
>>
>> You and "usual suspect" might think that nature and
>> natural predation is cruel, but normal-thinking people
>> don't, I'm glad to say.
>
>Thousands of normal-thinking people say it is, try Googling "'nature' and
>'cruel'". It also fits one of the definitions of the word exactly "Causing
>pain or suffering".

Nature and natural predation is not and cannot be cruel,
stupid, whatever you and "usual suspect" say. You're
both idiots.

><snip>
>
Why did you snip all the evidence of your and "usual
suspect"'s lies, coward? can't you deal with the fact
that you're a liar?

<unsnip>
"usual suspect" is on record as agreeing with the
proposition that nature and natural predation is cruel,
yet he tries to insist he's never agreed to any such
thing at all. I've provided his quotes to show that he
does believe nature and natural predation is cruel

[start Mmhsb]
> natural predators & a natural life is cruel?
[usual suspect]
Yes. Watch the Discovery Channel sometime.
usual suspect http://tinyurl.com/2c9ac

So yes, I am raising an issue that "usual suspect"
1) believes nature and natural predation to be cruel
2) lies and snips away the evidence pointing to (1)

Another issue I'm raising in this thread is that "usual
suspect" unethically alters his opponent's sentences
before replying to them AND then lies by claiming
he doesn't. He invariably snips away all the evidence
in the link I keep providing showing he does, so once
again he is a proven liar.

<unsnip>
You did, and here's the proof that you did
http://tinyurl.com/2ox8r Just follow that
short thread from the beginning and you'll
see that you edited my posts before making
your replies to them. Once again, it's proven
beyond all doubt that you're lying.
<endsnip>

Now I've finished proving he lied etc., let's look at
the evidence showing your more recent lies now,
shall we? You've been claiming all these years that
you live in Canada, yet evidence from
http://www.ip2location.com/IP-COUNTRY.HTM
shows you live in Kirkland, Washington.

24.113.90.217 US UNITED STATES WASHINGTON KIRKLAND

[IP2Location™ IP-COUNTRY database enables solution
to determine the country of any IP address in a few simple
steps. First, retrieve IP address from networking protocol
or server-side variable of Web server. Next, translate IP
address to IP number in decimal format to speed up
database query. Lastly, reverse lookup the IP number from
the IP2Location™ database

** to pinpoint exact geographical location.**]
http://www.ip2location.com/IP-COUNTRY.HTM

Why have you been lying, Dutch?
<unsnip>