On Fri, 21 May 2004 22:48:03 GMT, usual suspect > wrote:

>ipse dixit wrote:
>> You've snipped out a whole discussion concerning your
>> view on natural predation and how you lied to avoid
>> admitting it. And you criticize ME for unethical snipping?
>
>Yes. That is all you ever do.

For once I agree: it's ALL I ever do, but, unlike you
I don't edit my opponent's sentences before replying
to them.

Follow this link http://tinyurl.com/2ox8r and it's short
thread from the beginning and you'll see that you edited
entire sentences of my posts before making your replies
to them. I snipped a few of your childish rants, but that
doesn't give you the excuse to edit my whole sentences
in return. You're unethical and a *damned* liar, "christian."

Also, you've snipped out a whole discussion concerning
your view on natural predation and how you lied to avoid
admitting it.

<unsnip>
If we go back to the beginning of this thread, it's clear
to see you're contesting my assertion that you believe
natural predation is cruel. Bob agrees that my opening
remark is "clearly what you said, "christian". You then
responded by claiming, "That is NOT what I said", yet
the evidence I keep providing shows you do believe it's
cruel, so it's clear you've lied on this issue. Here (below)
is the discussion you've snipped away showing how you
lied.

[start me]
> >>>>It's clear from those quotes that "usual suspect" believes
> >>>>natural predation is cruel while human predation isn't,
[You]
> >>Bullshit, you shit-stirring punk.
[Bob]
> > Nope that's clearly what you said, "christian".
[You]
> That is NOT what I said.
[my proof showing you DO think it's cruel and that you lied]
[start Mmhsb]
> natural predators & a natural life is cruel?
[usual suspect]
Yes. Watch the Discovery Channel sometime.
usual suspect http://tinyurl.com/2c9ac
[end]

Nothing could be simpler to show
1) you believe natural to be cruel
2) you lied by pretending you didn't believe it to be cruel

and you call yourself a Christian?
[..]