perpetually lying dog-abuser wrote:
<...>
>>There was *no* name-calling in any of that, you fat ****ing liar. See also
>>http://snipurl.com/6l04 for an example of how you took me completely out of
>>context to make your pretext.
>>
>>Starting with you...
>>------
>>
>>>Nonsense. Every moral agent is entirely autonomous, fool.
>>
>>Note your snip, asshole. That statement was qualified by what followed. Stop
>>taking things out of context to make a pretext.
>>
>>RESTO
>>The autonomy the farmer has is pretty much limited to his choice to sell in the
>>free market in the first place. Beyond that, his decisions are borne of
>>prevailing market conditions. Farmers are free to niche market to people
>>concerned about pesticide use, GMOs, etc., and even CDs, but they will only do
>>that if there's a market for such effort so he can profit from it.
>>END RESTORE
>>
>>What part of *that* do you specifically object?
>>
>>------
>>
>>You snipped that
>
> Again, just a snip of material I'd already gone over before

No, a snip of stuff you'd chosen to ignore. You never answered my question.

> rather than the editing of whole sentences as you do. You
> can't compare the two.

Sure I can. They're two sides of the same coin. :-)

> What you do is downright dishonest
> and unethical.

So is what you do, drama queen.

> You shouldn't EDIT your opponents posts
> before replying to them.

Sauce for the goose, fatso.

<...>
> You've shown where I've snipped stuff I've covered
> before

No, more like stuff you refused to address.

> but you still haven't shown where I've EDITED
> your sentences before replying to them. You, on the other
> hand have edited mine and I've shown you the proof of
> that with a link.

Well I'll be *darned*. Really, lol?

<...>