On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:23:46 -0400, clams_casino
> wrote:



>
>With McBush, it's likely we will stay in the same pathetic economy that
>we've had for the past 6 years - an ever sinking dollar, creeping
>inflation, more deaths in Iraq, a sagging stock market, etc

Where have you been for the last six years.
Bush inherited a recession from Clinton and 9/11 because of Clinton
not taking Osoma when offered.
The stock market grew for five of those six years
Unemployment dropped, due to tax cuts.


>It was widely shown that GW's initial tax rebates
>(which primarily went to the wealthy) ended up primarily for paying down
>debt - NOT business expansion / investment..

Widely known? I haven't heard that, where did you get your
information. Cite please.


> GW has been all about providing
>welfare for the rich - at the expense of the majority.

The tax cuts to the wealthy created jobs, so the poor didn't need
welfare.
But I agree, too much of my money that I worked for is going to other
people.


>
>So the bottom line ends up that if you feel the president has nothing to
>do with the economy,
He has very little with the economy. And that is widely known!!!!!!!!
>
>If nothing else, you really need to consider the upcoming Supreme
>Court appointments. Actually, that's really the most critical aspect of
>the next election.
And that is why I'm for Mc Cain.