View Single Post
  #41 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to misc.consumers.frugal-living,rec.food.cooking
AllEmailDeletedImmediately AllEmailDeletedImmediately is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33
Default To juice or not.

"clams_casino" > wrote in message
...
> Pan wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:02:26 -0400, clams_casino
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Bottom line is that the current tax code is pretty much in balance with
>>>respect to being a flat tax - most all pay a similar amount of total
>>>taxes as a percentage of their total income. The key here is TOTAL taxes
>>>as a percentage of TOTAL income. GW pushed the percentage in favor of
>>>the top. It's time to reverse that pendulum and not focus ONLY on
>>>income taxes as Republicans like to do.
>>>
>>>

>>Just where do you get this information.
>>The poor with the section 8 housing, free health care, welfare
>>payments,child credits & rebates pay a negative percentage of their
>>income.
>>

>
> which is a very small portion of the total, essentially balanced out by
> the relatively few wealthy who pay little no no income taxes.


among them the always worthless ted kennedy.
>
>
> Personally, I get much more welfare than those you are describing through
> the significant subsidies I (and many others) enjoy through generous
> deductions of mortgage interest, property taxes and a very generous,
> essentially tax free medical coverage. I do pay a significant amount
> of taxes, but without these generous subsidies, I'd never have been able
> to afford my more-than-adequate home which has appreciated significantly
> in value over the years (in site of the recent crash), where the proceeds
> are .... tax free.
>
>
>