"farrell77" > wrote in message
...
> "Dutch" > wrote in message
> ...
> > "farrell77" > wrote
> > > "usual suspect" > wrote
> > > > farrell77 wrote:
> > > > <...>
> > > > >>>>It's clear from those quotes that "usual suspect" believes
> > > > >>>>natural predation is cruel while human predation isn't,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Bullshit, you shit-stirring punk.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope that's clearly what you said, "christian".
> > > >
> > > > That is NOT what I said.
> > >
> > > It certainly is:
> >
> > Do *you* understand the meaning of the expression "nature can be cruel"?
> Do
> > you think people who say it believe that nature is immoral?
>
> Yes and in most cases probably not, respectively.

This is a typical example of Nash's ongoing attack-through-equivocation
campaigns. He's a deliberate shit-disturber (troll) and his 50%+1 argument
is no exception.