On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:14:38 -0400, "cybercat" >
fired up random neurons and synapses to opine:

>Good for you. None of the above changes my original objection to the post
>she made that started this thread. Bad content, bad form, and those of you
>who have not let her know that her "gosh aren't I cute" posts of this nature
>are not at all cute have done her a great disservice.
>
>You don't get that it matters not how much money she has or does not have.
>It's her constant display of her insipid values that disgusts me.
>
>I think less of you now as well. I clearly gave you a lot more credit than
>you were due for years. Ugh.
>
I was going to include Christine's post, but decided not to do so, as
you are clearly obsessing with my original post, which was meant to be
self-deprecating and far from "gosh aren't I cute." The point of the
original post no longer has any bearing on your multiplicity of posts
in response that clearly show your vicious nature.

I will no longer reply to your posts, as I will no longer see
them.Your value to the newsgroup is nil and I fail to see any posts
that are actually OT or that are worthy of reading.

Cheerio, aulde bean,
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"